← Back to list
Useful material

Document types in Scopus

Overview

Scopus classifies materials not only as articles but into different document types: article, review, conference paper, editorial, letter, note, and others. The document type affects how a publication appears and is interpreted in the database.

Main content

In detail

In Scopus, each record belongs to a specific document type. This helps the system catalogue materials correctly, build analytics, and calculate indicators.

Among the most common document types in Scopus

  • Article
  • Article-in-Press
  • Review
  • Conference Paper
  • Editorial
  • Letter
  • Note
  • Short Survey
  • Erratum
  • Retracted Article
  • Book
  • Book Chapter
  • Data Paper

Why this matters

  • not all document types are viewed the same way in scholarly practice;
  • when analyzing an author or journal profile, the publication type matters;
  • an article and an editorial are not the same thing even if both have DOI and indexing.

For example

  • article and review are more often treated as full scholarly publications;
  • editorial is an editorial text;
  • erratum is a correction;
  • conference paper is conference material;
  • article-in-press is a paper at the early online publication stage.

Sometimes a publisher labels a material one way, while Scopus classifies it somewhat differently. Therefore, when evaluating a publication, it is useful to look not only at whether the record exists but also at its type.

What is important to remember

If a publication is visible in Scopus, it is important to look not only at the fact of indexing but also at the document type under which it is counted.

Official and useful sources
Source

Elsevier. Scopus Content Coverage Guide.

Open source